49: What did Zapruder film?
While projecting the still frame from a bootleg copy of the Zapruder film on my dining room wall, I traced the above image. I also traveled to the grassy knoll to prove that the obscured image in Zapruder Frame 413 could be photographically recreated by standing atop the short white wall in the same spot where Abraham Zapruder had been.
Then I sent copies stating "This man wasn't hunting quail on11/22/63" to numerous Senators and Representatives in a personal campaign to stimulate a new JFK assassination investigation.
On October 13, 1976 Representative Henry B. Gonzalez (D-Texas) wrote thanking me for my effort.
Seconds before Frame 413--while everyone focused on Kennedy coming down Elm Street--the sniper could have been kneeling behind this white wall, a vantage point that would have made the coup de grâce virtually a straight shot at the President as he was traveling closer to him—a profoundly far more perfect shot than one from a downward angle six floors up in the School Book Depository as the President was traveling away from what became known as Oswald’s "Sniper’s Perch.”
Former Dallas County Deputy Sheriff, Roger Craig, gave an interview in which he discussed arriving on the scene, seeing the patrolman running toward the fence, what was observed and discovered in the Texas School Book Depository, as well as who told him to keep quiet, and what happened afterwards.
Sheriff J.E. "Bill" Decker told the police dispatcher at the time of the shooting, "Have my office move all available men out of my office into the railroad yard to try to determine what happened in there and hold everything secure until Homicide and other investigators get there."
The Zapruder film was enhanced by Robert J. Groden before it was aired in March 1975 on ABC-TV’s Good Night America, hosted by Geraldo Rivera. Zapruder Frame 413 also was reproduced in an issue of Rolling Stone magazine. Groden later wrote a book in which the mysterious figure on the grassy knoll was identified by the House Select Committee investigators as “Black Dog Man.” This odd description may have been a result of not realizing that the man was no longer facing the Elm Street—instead turning toward the stockade fence to pass the rifle over the fence and then walk from the crime scene. My interpretation differs in perspective from the indiscernible features of “Black Dog Man.”1
On October 30, 1976, I phoned Robert J. Groden, who had enhanced the Zapruder film, to discuss Frame 413 in his first book, JFK: The Case for Conspiracy,2 which showed a sketch of the individual facing Elm Street. He told me that Manor Books had approached him about doing the book and then had flopped one photo, cropped another, and used their own illustration much to his dismay. He said those involved in the project then left the company and there was no ad budget available to promote the book.
In 1993, Robert Groden produced a more comprehensive photographic book, The Assassination of a President3 and included a section on “Black Dog Man.”
A number of unidentified people were questioned that day including "three tramps" that a decade later some mistakenly believed looked like Watergate burglars. And an unnamed man was placed in the backseat of a police cruiser.
When Jim Garrison looked into the assassination in the late 1960s, one witness was Mary Moorman who took a Polaroid picture of the crime while looking toward the grassy knoll where the other witness, James Simmons said he saw "a puff of smoke."
Or from the Congo where Patrice Lumumba perished in 1961 after the CIA Director Allen Dulles compared him to Castro and discussed options with Agency personnel Thomas Parrot, Bronson Tweedy, Richard Bissell, Sydney Gottlieb and Lawrence Devlin?
Or was the hitman sent by the Mafia which had grown impatient with its ability to get casinos in Cuba reopened and angry with Robert Kennedy's crackdown on them in the United States?
Or was it a pro- or anti-Castro plot fueled with anger at JFK?
Would his dark features—like over 30% of Cubans—have ruled him out as a suspect in 1963 because President Kennedy had given impetus to the civil rights movement and angered ultra-conservative segregationists in March 1963 by calling “for new measures to protect Negro rights in voting, schools and jobs.”4
No doubt segregationists—like Senator James Eastland who was the Federal official most likely to conduct an investigation of the assassination as an internal security matter, not Chief Justice Earl Warren whom President Johnson named—would have proclaimed the sniper was proof that the civil rights movement was backed by communist enemies of America—a frequent accusation at the time according to an editorial that appeared in the Deseret News one month after the assassination.5
If the sniper was an anti-Castro exile, a cover-up would have been necessary to distance him from those in the CIA or other agencies that had been in contact with him or his friends. His motive would have been revenge for the lack of air cover that caused the failure at the Bay of Pigs and perhaps his own imprisonment or the death of a beloved parent or relative.
If he had been captured at the Bay of Pigs, how grateful—and owing— would he have felt to those who financially expedited the ransom negotiations that freed him?
If he were among the 300 Cuban exiles working out of Pawley’s office after the Bay of Pigs, would he have been so aroused by the ultra-conservative former Latin American Ambassador’s private and public rhetoric that the exile took the initiative to rid the nation of the president standing in the way of the swift defeat of communism?
Perhaps the mystery man was simply a soldier of fortune recruited from the sugar cane fields or the ranks of the unemployed military by a Milteer-type segregationist or some wealthy conservative who feared that Kennedy had made a pact with the communists that would doom the U.S.
FOOTNOTES:
1 F. Peter Model and Robert J. Groden, JFK: The Case for Conspiracy (New York: Manor Books, 1977). Pages 134 and 135.
Robert J. Groden, The Killing of a President (New York: Viking Penguin Books, 1993). Pages 192-195. For another perspective see:
Bill Miller, “The Myth of the Mystery Man in the Pyracantha Bush in Dealey Plaza.” JFK Lancer website.
"Commission Document 1420 - FBI Letterhead Memorandum of 11 August 1964 re: Transcripts 22 Nov and 24 Nov." Sheriff Decker request. Page 163 (166/220).
>> Captain C.E. Talbert told the Dispatcher "(Sgt. Jennings) has got about six men checking out that railroad, back toward that direction. If you get any information on the shooting ... (garbled transmission). [The direction was toward the triple overpass Stemmons Freeway overpass of the T&P railroad). Page 42/220.
2 F. Peter Model and Robert J. Groden, JFK: The Case for Conspiracy (New York: Manor Books, 1977), Pages 134 and 135.
3 Robert J. Groden, The Killing of a President (New York: Viking Penguin Books, 1993). Pages 192-195. JFK Library & Museum, Chronology from The New York Times, March 1, 1963.
5 Editorial: The Dubious Champion. Deseret News, Salt Lake Telegram, December 27, 1963, page A-10.
Stuart A. Reid, The Lumumba Plot: The Secret History of the CIA and a Cold War Assassination (Penguin Random Books, October 17, 1923).
“Lawrence R. Devlin, 86, C.I.A. Officer Who Balked on a Congo Plot, Is Dead.” By Scott Shane. The New York Times, December 12, 2008.
>> Devlin, the CIA’s Congo station chief in 1960, avoided executing the order to assassinate Patrice Lumumba, the ousted prime minister. “Sidney Gottlieb, the agency’s top poison expert, who passed on orders ... approved by President Dwight D. Eisenhower to kill Lumumba, who the United States feared might ally the mineral-rich Congo with the Soviet Union.” Devlin tossed “the poison toothpaste” into the Congo River. He later held the same position in Laos during the Vietnam War.
>> Dr. Sidney Gottlieb was the technical specialist technician on creating assassination devices under the CIA's MKULTRA program.
"CIA Story Time: From Patrice Lumumba's Assassination To Post-9/11 Torture." By Spencer Ackerman. Forever Wars substack, July 25, 2023.
>> Ackerman points out that Shane's Devlin obituary was written at a time before new revelations about the death of Lumumba came out.
Back then the major preoccupation of the CIA was the fate of its post-9/11 torture program which we now know tortured at least 119 people and abducted an unknown but surely larger number of others. A criminal investigation was underway into the destruction of nearly 100 2002-era videotapes from the agency's black site in Thailand which was run by Gina Haspel who in 2005 destroyed those videotapes along with her boss, clandestine-service chief Jose Rodriguez.
... As one of the most important CIA operators in Africa during the Cold War dating back to his pivotal role in the fatal coup against Patrice Lumumba of Congo in 1960-1, Devlin wasn't the type to put himself in the shoes of the waterboarded.
... [In] The Lumumba Plot: The Secret History of A Cold War Assassination ... Reid has exhumed and contextualized a wealth of detail about the agency's involvement in overthrowing Lumumba ... [and] thoroughly undermines the portrayal of Devlin in Shane's piece and subsequent ones relying on that interview.
... Devlin requested the CIA put in a confidential courier method called a diplomatic pouch "a high-powered, foreign-make rifle with a telescopic sight and a silencer," as, Devlin wrote, "the hunting is good here when the light's right."
In a groundbreaking 2010 article for the journal Intelligence and National Security, former U.S. congressional staffer Stephen Weissman reported that the rifle request was one of nine different proposed CIA plots—eight of them proposed by Devlin—to kill Lumumba.
>> On January 17, 1961, just three days before John Fitzgerald Kennedy took over the presidency from Dwight David Eisenhower, Lumumba was executed by a firing squad in a combined effort by Belgian police and his Congolese opposition headed by Mobutu who received briefcases of cash from the CIA which helped fund fake street protests against Lumumba.
>> Similar to the CIA propoganda playbook of creating street protests against perceived communist leaders, in 1963, the DRE and Lee Harvey Oswald were involved in street protest confrontation about Castro. Oswald also ordered a foreign-made rifle (no diplomatic pouch necessary).
>> According to the Mary Ferrell Foundation website, when Lawrence Devlin (possibly aka Robert Guthman and Walter Heston) testified before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Activities chaired by Senator Frank Church, he used the pseudonym Victor S. Hedgman.
Labels: anti-Castro, Black Dog Man, Dealey Plaza, Eastland, Elm Street, exiles, FBI, Frame 413, Grassy Knoll, Groden, HSCA, Kennedy, Pawley, pro-Castro, Rockefeller, Zapruder
<< Home